Interactive lifecycle
Student X at University Z — one profile, changing sponsors
Click any stage. The dashboard, competency map, payer badge, recommendations and privacy permissions all update. Student X and University Z are fictional.
Residency and specialty training
- Sponsor / payer
- Teaching hospital / training programme
- Immediate job to be done
- Pass specialty examinations and evidence progression to the programme director.
- Competency framework
- Specialty curriculum (e.g. internal medicine competencies)
Active product modules
- • Baseline assessment
- • Adaptive pathway
- • Governed simulation
- • Cohort analytics
- • Accreditation evidence
Data permissions at this stage
- • Programme sees assigned assessment + remediation
- • Personal practice data remains learner controlled
Learner dashboard
Dashboard — Residency and specialty training
Career stage & sponsor
Student X — second-year resident, internal medicine
Teaching hospital training programme
Requirement: Specialty written examination — 5 months away
Weekly adaptive plan
- Specialty exam adaptive block: respiratoryAdaptive · 40m
- Governed simulation: undifferentiated breathlessnessSimulation · 30m
- Assigned remediation from programme directorRemediation · 20m
Competency domains & trend
- Diagnostic reasoning81▲9
- Acute management74▲12
- Procedural knowledge66▲4
- Communication83▲5
- Evidence appraisal71▲14
Vertical marker = stage target.
Recommended simulation
Undifferentiated breathlessness in an adult (governed)
Acute management is 11 points below programme target. · 30 min
Why this was recommended
- Baseline-to-retest gain slowed in acute management.
- Programme director assigned targeted remediation on 12 Feb.
- Examination blueprint weights respiratory presentations heavily.
Referenced remediation
Prioritising differentials under uncertainty
Specialty curriculum module
Investigation sequencing
Peer-reviewed review
Longitudinal progress
Privacy & sharing controls
- • Programme sees assigned assessment + remediation
- • Personal practice data remains learner controlled
Portable items currently shared: 2 of 5
Comparison
The same learner at four stages
Data changes meaningfully between stages: domains, requirements, sponsor and recommendations all differ.
Graduation checkpoint
University sponsorship is ending in 30 days
An explicit, symmetric decision. Every option is equally available and equally presented — no dark patterns, no default pre-selection toward payment.
Consent interface — what continues
Select what carries forward. Selections are independent; nothing is bundled.
Authorised portable competency summary
Learner controlled · Domain scores, trends and stage targets.
Simulation and reasoning history
Learner controlled · Educational activity only; no patient data.
Remediation record
Shared — requires both consents · Assigned by a programme; carries programme context.
Personal reflective notes
Learner controlled · Never shared without explicit selection.
Formal institutional assessment
Institution controlled · Cannot be ported by the learner; requested from the institution.
Data categories and control
- Personal learning profileLearner controlled
- Formal institutional assessmentInstitution controlled
- Authorised portable summaryLearner authorises each recipient
- Aggregated analyticsDe-identified
- Patient-identifiable dataNever stored
Controller and processor roles are a design requirement to be agreed with each institution.